ACM

Reno and Charter agree to wait on PEG Channel changes

From the Alliance for Community Media List serve:

Reno, Nev.

Charter Agrees to Hold Off on Moving Public, Education and Government Channels

Reno, NV Charter agreed today it would not move Public, Education and Government
(PEG) channels over the next 90 days to allow the City of Reno and Charter
Communications to continue discussing the issues.

The City of Reno has agreed to hold off on filing for a temporary restraining order
against Charter Communications for the next 90 days.

On August 20, 2008 the City Council directed the City Attorneys Office to take legal
action to stop Charter from moving PEG channels from their current locations to
higher channel numbers on the digital tier. The channels were scheduled to move on
August 26, 2008.

No quorum, no meeting, a little progress however.

No quorum, no meeting last night. The meeting may be rescheduled for July 22, 2008 stay tuned for more fun and frolics. I hope you can join us.

There was no meeting but we did converse while waiting for no show members.

One topic of conversation centered around the City Manager's request of his Cable Advisory committee to recommend how he should allocate the capital grant portion of the cable franchise license to the PEG channels ( 11, 12 and WCCA TV 13).

The conversation got a little testy after WCCA asked why the process of deciding what to recommend to is taking so long, when between the school and city accounts there appears to be a remaining balance exceeding $1.8 million dollars of unencumbered un-used cable franchise money ( as of June 2008). We believe that amount may be more than enough to satisfy the capital needs of all three PEG channels plus finance the attorney for the next renewal .The question seemed to be received with much resentment from the city's director of the government channel, who is also the head of the city's cable division, recording secretary for the cable advisory committee and city administration's liaison to the committee , who also seems to have a lot of clout with the group ( we're not sure how that is not a conflict of interest, but we already fought and lost that one ). The meeting quickly ended, but not before the Committee Chair said he would look into the Government and WPS channel account through the city auditor's department. The representatives from the WPS did not seem to know about the over $ 600,000 balance they had, which I found interesting.

Remember though, this wasn't an official meeting, there was no quorum.

For the last couple of months while we attended the one other cable advisory meeting held, we are told that the capital grant has to be split between the three PEG channels, and we were left with the impression that it was unlikely WCCA's would receive the full amount of capital it needs to meet current equipment needs. In addition we were led to understand that the city may take funds, of the top, to pay for an attorney for the next renewal. Last night,the government channel, the school channel, and WCCA TV13, all informed the committee members in attendance of what each respective channel's equipment capital needs were. WCCA needs to have nearly every single piece of equipment replaced with digital technology. All three PEG channels, combined, need about a bit less than about $ 700,000 Capital funds for the next five years. Not really far from the level capital funds received in 1997.

We hope to avoid any injustice in the process. In the recent past, WCCA has contributed surveys, comprehensive assessments, focus group results, a survey produced by Nancy Richard a member of the Alliance for Community Media, which indicated best practices, franchise rev's, PEG staff assignments, throughout the nation , with intention to help the city's cable and telecommunication strategy. We also pointed to the folks who pioneered this industry and set the standard, to the best of public access centers, and municipal franchise best practices, including third party consulting reports and all the rest of it. More importantly hundreds of people wrote, sent letters, editorials, petitioned, or came to public hearings in support of WCCA, but none of it appears to be enough as far as we can tell ( contrary to the purpose of an ascertainment process). We couldn't find much of it included in the Cable Advisory ascertainment report by the way either.

This however, still raises concerns. TV is the most important medium on the face of the earth.For the past 22 years WCCA, it's staff and volunteers, has and continues to be dedicated to serving the people of this city, as we provide a cutting edge technological resource to empower citizens, so everyone can share in the free flow of information at level unmatched on TV or anywhere else. Public Access is and should be one of the center pieces of municipal telecommunication and cable strategic plans.

When I hear stories of how some cities go out of their way to encourage and support their public access centers, to ensure and be inclusive of Public Access, accepting and fighting to secure the added value and vital role Public Access plays in their community, how do you think it makes us feel in the midst of our experience of Worcester's cable franchise process?

Look through this website, anything you need to know about public access can be found here or through various links throughout it's content.This is not reinventing the wheel.

The city council passed a motion asking the city manager to sign a contract with WCCA by the end of June. Perhaps by the next August Council meeting we have more news to share.

Competition equals lower prices? Think again.

link

Cable Franchising Bills No Help To Consumers: Survey
66% Of Respondents Say Cable Rates Are Up Despite Competition
by Linda Haugsted
Multichannel News
07/07/08

State cable franchising bills have not led to lower cable rates, and support for
public access channels has eroded in those states with such schemes, according to a
survey conducted by the Alliance for Community Media and the National Association of
Telecommunications Officers and Advisors.

The survey, which included 140 public access center officials from 18 states where
cable is no longer locally regulated, showed that 66% of the respondents said basic
cable rates have increased in their communities, even after the arrival of
competition.

In testimony in support of many of these bills, supporters asserted that the quick
arrival of competition, enabled by such bills, would lower consumer rates. Only 1%
of survey respondents said rates decreased after the bills were passed.

Competitors have taken advantage of the new regulatory regime: 68% of respondents
said competitors, including AT&T and Verizon, have applied for state franchises.
However, incumbents are taking advantage of the regulatory change, too. Fifty-two
percent of respondents said legacy operators have applied to be regulated by the
state.

The ACM is most interested in the impact to its members, and the rest of the survey
had to do with the current state of financial and other support for local cable
production. Twenty percent of the respondents, from communities in California,
Florida, Iowa, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas and
Wisconsin said their funding had decreased since the passage of state regulatory
bills.

Twenty-six percent of those polled said they've lost free cable service to
libraries, school and other public buildings; and 41% said they've lost or had a
reduction in benefits for the operation of local institutional networks.

The ACM said it would use the survey information to seek legislative or regulatory
action that will preserve localism provided by PEG channels.

~~~

Rob McCausland
Director of Information & Organizing Services
Alliance for Community Media
202-393-2650

GOOD NEWS: The Senate takes a stand against BIG media

Just moments ago, by a near-unanimous vote, the Senate stood up to Big
Media. They voted to throw out the FCC decision to let the largest
media companies swallow up even more local media.

This is simply an astounding victory, and it would not have happened
without the massive grassroots effort by you and thousands of others who called their senators, sent more than a quarter million letters,
posted thousands of pictures and stories on StopBigMedia.com, and testified at public hearings held by the FCC.

It was your dedication that made today's Senate win possible.

Today was a huge step forward, but there is still much to do. The fight against the FCC now moves to the House, where our elected representatives need to hear from us.

President Bush has promised that he will try to veto this bill. But tonight the Senate and the American people have spoken with one voice.
This historic vote sends a clear message that the only people who support more media consolidation are Big Media lobbyists and the White House.

We are in this struggle to bring more minority ownership, diverse perspectives and independent voices to the media. We need to make media consolidation an election-year issue. And we need to start talking about how to break up the giant conglomerates.

Corporate news today -- with its propaganda pundits, horse-race election coverage, and celebrity gossip -- undermines our democracy. We must continue to speak out and demand that the public airwaves be used to actually serve the public.

In just three weeks, thousands of people will be gathering together in Minnesota to build the movement for better media. You can join them at the National Conference for Media Reform, just visit www.freepress.net/conference.
FreePress

For today, know that you played a key role in the fight for better
media for all.

Thank you,

Josh Silver
Executive Director
Free Press Action Fund

We point to the archive where you may view a C-Span 2 covergage SUBCOMMITTEE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND THE INTERNET hearing

Thanks to the Rob McCausland of the ACM for forwarding this to us.
SUBCOMMITTEE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND THE INTERNET HEARING ENTITLED, "PUBLIC EDUCATION, AND GOVERNMENTAL (PEG) SERVICES IN THE DIGITAL TV AGE"

link

Note: Congressmen/women discuss how PEG access is now providing important local coverage that NO ONE else is providing.

C-SPAN COPYRIGHT POLICY

C-SPAN holds the exclusive copyright in the video of all the public affairs programming it produces.

Although C-SPAN is the only news media organization that regularly televises the legislative proceedings of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate, it does not hold a copyright in that video coverage. That government-produced video is in the public domain which means that it belongs to the American people and may be used without restrictions of any kind.

As part of its mission to make the activities of the federal government more broadly available, C-SPAN has established a copyright policy that allows the public to use C-SPAN's video coverage of federal government events for their own purposes. Those who want to use C-SPAN copyrighted video will be able to do so without concern about further copyright restrictions as long as they adhere to the following policy:

# C-SPAN permits non-commercial use of its video coverage of federal government-sponsored events so long as C-SPAN is identified during the use as the source of the video.

# Keeping a "C-SPAN" logo on the screen during the use is sufficient to identify C-SPAN as the source.

# This generally unrestrictive policy regarding non-commercial use does not apply to (i) original programs created by C-SPAN, (ii) video coverage of privately sponsored events, and (iii) video coverage of other events not sponsored by the federal government.

# C-SPAN does not permit unlicensed commercial use of any of its video programming regardless of whether the use cites C-SPAN as the source of the video. Commercial uses of C-SPAN video may be permitted under an individually negotiated license for which a license fee may be due. [See Licensing and Permissions Requests]

# Nothing in this copyright policy is intended to affect any person's right to make a "fair use" of C-SPAN video programming.

Time Warner trial ends flat-rate Internet fees. Imagine being on the Internet with a meter running.

To me, the following article is a warning that the city of Worcester should be paying attention and solidify a franchise before things shift against municipal and the PEG channel use of broadband. I have read that already Charter and Comcast have suggested they will follow suit. Net Neutrality must exist in order for PEG to remain on the Internet.
If we loose this, depending upon the use of the Internet to reach out and connect could be more costly than ever.

I am sharing this, with thanks, as it appears to be posted by Kim Peterson (Moneyblog Topstocks) and later presented on the ACM's list serve by Ron Beacom.
Time Warner trial ends flat-rate Internet fees

MD

Verizon continues to raise its rates

Cable Competition? Note to city: Be careful what you wish for.

Mike from MNN writes: According to our math, Verizon jacked their cable TV rates 7.5% last year and they now project another 11.5 rate increase this year.
Apparently "Competition = Higher Prices". Hopefully the FCC and those folks in Congress will take note . . .

Read more here
also this By Mike Robuck CedMagazine.com .

Do you think, that it when comes to comparing cable and phone companies, they really are, pretty much, all the same? Rates continue to go up and up. So much for competition. It seems that rate controls, and franchise mandates and regulations are the only way to go. Tell congress to protect local franchises and especially provisions to support Public access.

About Public Access and YouTube

FROM ANTHONY Riddle ACM:
Anthony writes
"1) That article...written on PAPER!?!?

2) "Waynes World"? We have trained a generation of new producers who were born AFTER "Wayne's World" hit SNL around October 1988. They'd be about 19, typically media active and might not have ever heard of Wayne.

3) Trade Access for You-Tube? That's like closing the public park because your neighbors have a back-yard.

4) Or ending public transportation because some people have cars. (My home town LA did that and you see what happened.)

5) Or trading the ocean for a million cups of saltwater.

I have begun to imagine a concert in a stadium with with 50,000 fans all listening to the same song on 50,000 I-Pods in a deeply shared silence. And then I think, however nice that glow is, it is no substitute for the twinkle of ancient stars.

(And tell me again, why do we react so strongly to someone who writes on PAPER that perhaps our medium is quaint?)"

My Two cents:
Our Public Access Channels of distribution do not have to be limited to cable only. We are fighting for expanded definition and legislative latitude to support a much broader bands of distribution. Our Public Access content deserves to be seen on broadcast, cable, the web, phone systems, via satellite, and whatever else will be invented. PEG needs to be supported through government mandates to enable such capacity for each and every center. Other channels such as YouTube , Blip, PEG channel websites and links, print media, radio, etc., can be tools to promote and encourage use of our facilities as well as outreach on behalf of community producers and journalist. I see public access as a community media clearinghouse of sorts. Why every Legislator or government office holder ( on the Fed, State and Local level) doesn't support that position whole heartedly is a mystery to me. It should be a no brainer .

Congressman James McGovern: save the voice of the people!

PUBLIC ACTION NEEDED!
EMAIL/CALL CONGRESS TO STOP FCC!
(FCC DN MB 05-311)
The Alliance for Community Media has set up a site to make it easy for you, your friends, relatives and supporters to write your Congressional delegation. Congress needs to know that the FCC is on the verge of taking Congressional power as they rewrite cable law. It is important for Congress to know that their constituents are active in community media and that you are ready to fight.

The rules of this process are written against your interests. You are not allowed to call or write the FCC right now, but your Congress-members can.

Being written out of the law by the FCC:

· Support for Public, Education and Government Access Channels: GONE!
· Channel capacity for Public, Education and Government Access Channels from new providers. GONE!
· Your city's right to reasonable payment by the telephone and cable companies who make billions of dollars using public land. GONE!
· Your city's public safety and educational communication systems. GONE!
The rules will be rewritten Wednesday. Only your Congress-members can stop the FCC now. Tell them to support your community. Tell them to forward your concerns to the FCC NOW!

For easy email message, click here.

Please circulate this call to action far and wide.

Syndicate content